Jamie Golombek seems to be at a current case that handled the exemption and the way it’s utilized
Opinions and suggestions are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia could earn an affiliate fee from purchases made via hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
There’s a typical false impression that Indigenous individuals in Canada merely don’t pay tax, however that’s usually not true since with the intention to be exempt from tax, the revenue earned have to be located on a reserve.
A current case, determined earlier this month, handled the exemption and the way it’s utilized. The case concerned an worker who’s a Haudenosaunee Iroquois Confederacy Treaty Indian from the Six Nations of Grand River in Ontario who lives on the reserve and works as a clerk at a hospital simply exterior the reserve. She took the place that the revenue she earned from working on the hospital was exempt from tax.
Commercial 2
Article content material
The worker is a “Standing Indian” throughout the which means of the Indian Act. Underneath the act, the non-public property of an Indigenous particular person located on a reserve is exempt from tax. Prior jurisprudence has concluded that the employment revenue of such an individual is private property, and so if the taxpayer’s employment revenue from her work on the hospital was located “on a reserve,” it could be exempt from tax.
The aim of the exemption for revenue earned on a reserve, as articulated by the Supreme Courtroom, is to “protect the entitlement of Indians to their reserve lands and to make sure that using their property on their reserve lands (is) not eroded by the flexibility of governments to tax, or collectors to grab.” Its goal is “to not confer a normal financial profit.”
Within the current case, the important thing query was whether or not the worker’s revenue may very well be thought of to be earned on a reserve and, if that’s the case, be exempt from tax. A 1991 Supreme Courtroom resolution held that whether or not revenue is located “on a reserve” is decided primarily based on whether or not there are ample connecting components to the reserve.
Prime Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
The court docket set out a two-step take a look at: determine the doubtless related connecting components that join the revenue to the reserve, after which analyze these components to find out how a lot weight should be given to every of them.
Prior jurisprudence has established 5 connecting components which might be probably related within the context of figuring out whether or not employment revenue might be stated to have been earned on a reserve: the residence of the employer, the residence of the worker, the situation the place the worker is paid, the situation the place the work is carried out and the character of the providers carried out.
The decide famous that for the reason that central administration and management of the hospital didn’t happen on the Six Nations reserve, this argues for taxation. However, the worker lives on the reserve, a couple of 10-minute drive from the hospital, which argues for exemption from taxation. The worker was additionally paid by direct deposit to her checking account on the reserve, which additionally argues for exemption from taxation.
However issues received a bit extra sophisticated when evaluating the situation of the work and the character of the providers carried out.
Commercial 4
Article content material
The worker carried out the overwhelming majority of her work on the hospital, which isn’t on the reserve, however on non-public land that was donated to the hospital in 1961. The worker took the place that the hospital land belongs to the Six Nations, having been given to them in 1784 underneath the Haldimand Proclamation in recognition of their service to the Crown through the American Revolution. She stated the proclamation gave the Six Nations all of the land inside six miles of the Grand River, which is a large swath of land described as being “roughly 9,000,000 acres, solely 5 per cent of which is roofed by the Six Nations reserve.”
The taxpayer produced a Google Earth map purporting to indicate that the hospital was inside six miles of the reserve, however, primarily based on the distances on the map and the map’s scale, it appeared the hospital could have been situated about 8.4 miles from the reserve. Nonetheless, the decide felt this was irrelevant since he wasn’t being requested to resolve whether or not the hospital’s land rightfully belongs to the Six Nations, however whether or not the hospital itself is situated on the reserve.
Commercial 5
Article content material
The time period “reserve” is outlined within the Indian Act as a “tract of land, the authorized title to which is vested in His Majesty, that has been set aside by His Majesty for the use and advantage of a band.” Whereas the decide was keen, for the aim of the enchantment, to simply accept that the hospital is situated on disputed land, authorized title to the hospital land just isn’t vested in “His Majesty” and concluded it’s nonetheless not situated on the Six Nations reserve, so the location-of-work issue argues for taxation.
The ultimate issue to be weighed was the character of the providers carried out. The worker’s position was to course of docs’ orders, reply telephones and name bells, do scheduling, order provides, relieve different workers on switchboard duties and transfer beds when required.
The hospital serves the encompassing neighborhood, together with individuals who reside on the reserve and is one among 5 hospitals within the space. Individuals dwelling on the reserve will usually go to whichever hospital is closest to the place they reside. There was no proof to counsel that the majority of the hospital’s sufferers got here from the reserve. Equally, solely three of the hospital’s roughly 100 workers lived on the reserve.
Commercial 6
Article content material
Advisable from Editorial
The worker was unable to level to something concerning the nature of the providers she carried out or the operations of the hospital that may in any approach join her providers to the reserve. She felt that appreciable weight ought to be given to the truth that the hospital is on disputed land, however the decide famous that this reality “might need been related if the character of (her) work had been intently tied to the reserve.”
Ultimately, the decide gave average weight to the worker’s residence and that of her employer, little weight to the place of cost and important weight to the situation and nature of her work. Primarily based on this, he discovered that the worker’s employment revenue was taxable.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
In case you favored this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.
Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it’s essential to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
