Jamie Golombek: Taxpayers who inadvertently overcontribute to their TFSA face a hefty penalty tax
Critiques and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia could earn an affiliate fee from purchases made via hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
Canadians will quickly be capable of contribute one other $7,000 to their tax-free financial savings accounts for 2024. For somebody who has by no means contributed to a TFSA, and has been a resident of Canada and a minimum of 18 years of age since 2009, the cumulative TFSA restrict will hit $95,000.
Your private TFSA contribution restrict in any given 12 months, nevertheless, will fluctuate primarily based on each prior years’ contributions in addition to any withdrawals. That’s as a result of the complete quantity withdrawn (each your contributions and any tax-free earnings or progress) is added again to your contribution room in the beginning of the calendar 12 months following the withdrawal.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Article content material
It’s necessary to remain on prime of your TFSA contribution restrict lest you inadvertently overcontribute and face the overcontribution penalty tax equal to 1 per cent monthly for every month you’re over your restrict. A one per cent tax doesn’t look like loads, however remember the fact that the tax is one per cent monthly for every month you’re over the restrict till the overcontribution is withdrawn.
For instance, in case you by chance overcontribute in January 2024 and don’t uncover your error till January 2025, your penalty tax for 2024 could be 12 per cent of your overcontribution. Provided that the penalty tax is paid with after-tax {dollars}, in case you’re within the prime tax bracket of round 50 per cent, you’d want a 24 per cent price of return in your TFSA overcontribution funding simply to equal the penalty tax.
Consequently, it’s finest to not get into an overcontribution scenario, so you actually needs to be monitoring your personal TFSA restrict. That is much more necessary for taxpayers who’ve a number of TFSAs, those that don’t maximize their contributions every year and, particularly, those that repeatedly (and even sometimes) withdraw funds from their TFSA.
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Thankfully, you possibly can examine your TFSA contribution on-line by logging on to the Canada Income Company’s on-line portal for people referred to as My Account. However take into accout your TFSA contribution and withdrawal data isn’t up to date in actual time and could also be outdated. Verify the “as of” date posted on-line alongside along with your TFSA room.
In case you do get assessed with a TFSA overcontribution tax, you possibly can all the time ask the CRA to waive or cancel it, which the company has the facility to do if it may be established the tax arose “as a consequence of an affordable error” and the overcontribution is withdrawn from the TFSA “at once.” If the CRA refuses to cancel the tax, you possibly can take the matter to federal courtroom, the place a choose will decide whether or not the company’s resolution to not waive the tax was cheap.
A tax case determined final week concerned somebody who by chance overcontributed to his TFSA and, because of this, was assessed the penalty tax and curiosity. The taxpayer had acquired a discover from the CRA indicating his TFSA contribution room as of Jan. 1, 2020, was “($5,000), the brackets indicating he was over the restrict by that a lot, however he understood this to imply he may contribute one other $5,000 to his TFSA. For the reason that contribution room for 2020 had elevated to $6,000, he contributed that quantity, thus inadvertently growing his contributions to “($11,000),” or $11,000 over the restrict.
Commercial 4
Article content material
He instantly eliminated the surplus contributions when he acquired the CRA’s 2020 discover of evaluation of the TFSA overcontribution penalty tax and curiosity, and knowledgeable the CRA of such. He then requested the penalty tax and curiosity be waived arguing that “not having an accounting background,” he had misunderstood the usage of the brackets. He argued this was an trustworthy mistake.
The CRA declined to take action, indicating the taxpayer had beforehand been notified about making extra contributions, so this was not the primary time he had overcontributed. The taxpayer denied having ever been notified by the CRA a few prior extra TFSA contribution, though he did admit {that a} “TFSA Schooling letter” had been posted to his CRA account on Might 17, 2019. He testified he had not learn it as a result of, in his view, “it was basic data not particularly directed at him.”
The taxpayer determined to enchantment his TFSA evaluation in courtroom, arguing the CRA’s refusal to cancel the penalty tax and curiosity was unfair. Sadly, he selected the incorrect courtroom, mistakenly interesting to the Tax Court docket of Canada.
Commercial 5
Article content material
It appears logical that in case you wished to dispute a tax assessed underneath the Revenue Tax Act, you’ll enchantment to the Tax Court docket, however it is a frequent mistake, particularly by taxpayers who determine to characterize themselves in courtroom and are usually not conversant in the authorized course of.
The part of the Revenue Tax Act that provides the CRA the power to forgive the overcontribution penalty tax is a part of the “Taxpayer reduction provisions.” A 2014 Federal Court docket of Attraction resolution confirmed that “the Tax Court docket doesn’t have the jurisdiction to find out whether or not the (CRA) correctly exercised (its) discretion … when deciding whether or not or to not waive or cancel a penalty.” Reasonably, this will solely be challenged “by means of an software for judicial overview within the Federal Court docket.”
This was reconfirmed in a 2019 resolution, which acknowledged the “case regulation is evident: if a taxpayer desires a overview of the (CRA’s) resolution regarding curiosity reduction he should file an software for judicial overview on the Federal Court docket … (the Tax Court docket) can’t grant the reduction that the (taxpayers) are in search of.”
Associated Tales
Commercial 6
Article content material
The choose within the present case famous these two selections had been “ample to eliminate the enchantment,” however he nonetheless reviewed the taxpayer’s arguments and concluded his enchantment couldn’t be allowed. “Ultimately, the (taxpayer) had an obligation to make sure that his contributions had been throughout the annual contribution restrict,” he stated in his ruling. “Had he taken the time to trace these quantities, he may have averted the surplus contributions and thus the penalties.”
As we enter a brand new tax 12 months, my finest TFSA recommendation continues to be: Know your restrict and keep inside it.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
In case you preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.
Article content material